July 20, 2006: Survey of FDA Scientists Indicates Political Interference

A survey taken by 997 FDA scientists suggests a pervasive problem of low morale among agency employees, due in large part to political interference by appointees. Sixty-two percent of those who participated in the poll were senior scientists and almost a third had worked for the FDA for more than 15 years. The survey was conducted by the Union of Concerned Scientists and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).
Seventeen percent said “FDA decision makers” had asked them on at least one occasion to modify conclusions in an FDA document for nonscientific reasons.
More than 40 percent knew of situations where political appointees had interfered with FDA determinations or actions.
Forty-seven percent knew of instances where “commercial interests” improperly engaged in efforts to modify FDA conclusions.
Only 51 percent said they believe the FDA is effectively safeguarding public health.
Forty percent said there were times they chose not to publicly express concerns for fear of retaliation.
Almost 70 percent said the agency lacks the needed resources to fulfill its regulatory duties.
Forty percent said morale is poor or extremely poor.
Only 32 percent said they feel the FDA is moving in the right direction. [Union of Concerned Scientists, 7/20/2006 ; New Jersey Star-Ledger, 7/21/2006]